ylai@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoOpen Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AIwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1143arrow-down1external-linkOpen Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AIwww.theregister.comylai@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarevrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·6 months agoyou released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 months agoWut. That license is literally compatible with the GPL
minus-squareleopold@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 months agoCC BY-SA is considered open source. CC BY-NC is not.
you released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not
Wut. That license is literally compatible with the GPL
CC BY-SA is considered open source. CC BY-NC is not.