Looking for another part time job. the vast majority of these available jobs read like the creepy listing where some guy is looking for a roommate but is specifically looking for female roommates only.

Just gross.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Employer: what is your expected salary so we can offer you 10k less and then act surprised when you say no.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      remember film “don’t be a menace to south central” mc did right thing when applied to job, wrote in job application paper “3 mil cash”, i mean, i would be good with $2990000 offer

  • thisfro@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 months ago

    Literally about to apply for a job that doesn’t post it, even though it is a government agency and they have fixed salary brackets for each job…

    • WagnasT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 months ago

      My old manager was complaining about a lack of quality applicants, i pointed out the advertisements don’t list the salary and she said since we’re government they can just look it up. Oh well, hope you like your lousy candidates.

  • YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    The even more annoying one is when the listing says “Confidential” for both the salary and the company that’s hiring.

      • YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I get it in some cases hiding the company name but in that case, the salary should be disclosed as the bare minimum.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      These are usually jobs that are listed by recruitment agencies. They don’t want you to know the company since then you could just apply directly to the company, and they won’t get their cut.

      Recruitment agencies often take a percentage of the salary, at least for the first year, as payment for referring a successful applicant. It’s transparent to the jobseeker - the salary you see is after the agency’s cut.

      The other time I see that here in Silicon Valley is for “stealth startups” - startups that are operating quietly, out of the spotlight, and haven’t yet applied for or gotten VC funding.

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love when HR goes out of their way to let you know that the company are assholes before you apply.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      My government agency when hiring all the roles in an IT team put those sort of stupid ranges in the headline, but if you drill down to a specific role you see the actual range

  • Seraph@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Capitalists: But we shouldn’t do anything legally to affect the Free Market!

    Proceeds to manipulate the Free Market

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Grateful for the California law that requires every job post to include the salary range

    Also from my recent experience most companies won’t agree to start you at more than 70% of that range as they want to be able to give raises before having to promote you

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The last California job I applied for and got, imagine my surprise when I experienced their advertised salary range was a bold blatant lie.

      I lasted 4 months there before I had a nervous breakdown. Yeah that’s how I deal with difficult life experiences. Nervous breakdowns. It has served me well so far in life. I got a better job.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Its such a false hope when unemployment is in the 3-4% range. You just end up wasting a bunch of people’s time, sifting for the one who will take the bait. In the end, it costs everyone more money so you can lie about how much salary you need to your own manager.

  • PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I use the wage filter on Stepstone because I don’t want to sift through more than 20 pages of job ads each week. Also, I’m seeing more and more companies asking for your expected salary when applying on their web page anyway. If they don’t, I just put in the number at the end of my cover letter. Cuts through the bullshit.
    Sure, I’m getting an order of magnitude fewer interviews this way, but on the other hand, I’m not wasting hours on dressing up and preparing myself, potentially even taking a day off and travelling out to the fucking company because they insist on meeting me in person, only to stare into blank faces after having answered the final interview question about my salary expectations.
    Rather recently, when I was in sudden dire need of a job, I could not pull that shit off, obviously, but I still managed to get more than in my previous job. Then again, it turned out to be the fucking worst job I ever had, by far, so there’s that, too.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    They can take the time to fill out a clear job description but leave vague details about how much you earn is crazy.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, that’s good, it only benefits the powerful (employers as they are in the position of power when taking money).

      I think EU is drafting a delegated act (hopefully) about this.

      The next stage is for info on all corp transactions to be available at least to stakeholders.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    One other thing to keep in mind is that it is perfectly legal in most jurisdictions requiring pay transparency in job postings to only give a part of the pay range. Say the range is 60,000 - 100,000, they could just say 60,000 - 80,000 or whatever they’re willing to hire people at.

    I don’t think this is necessarily wrong practice, but it’s definitely potentially misleading.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh, no no, capitalism welcomes competition, don’t’y’know.
    Just as long as it doesn’t mess with the profit margins.