• KiaKaha [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Imagine you could go back in time and have an actual state power in Iraq, instead of the hollow shell US contractors left it with, and implement adequate deradicalisation programmes.

    Would you do so? Or would you wait a few years, then bomb Raqqa to rubble?

      • KiaKaha [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        I figured ‘use various measures to target people prone to far right extremism, teach them why that’s wrong, then provide employment, while investing in the region to address the material conditions that led to the unrest’ was the nuanced approach.

        I’m sure there are ways it can be improved, and I’m sure their approach has its excesses. I’m just so far unconvinced that there’s any better historic approach to draw upon.

        If you know of any, please let me know.

        • ap1 [any,undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          leave Xinjiang as an autonomous zone, continue to offer voluntary education and work programs and welcome any refugees to China. Carrot vs stick.

          • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            The American South is a region filled with religious extremists, some of whom have already radicalized to the point of committing acts of terrorism. Should we make it its own country and fund their schools to boot? Is that likely to improve the situation or make it worse?