The argument was that Netanyahu was a favorable candidate in Israel for the purpose of an emerging multipolar world. Call that anti-west, pro-west, anti-Israel, pro-Israel, etc. as you please. I don’t believe a single word coming from Hinkle. that’s my view
The argument was that Netanyahu was a favorable candidate in Israel for the purpose of an emerging multipolar world. Call that anti-west, pro-west, anti-Israel, pro-Israel, etc. as you please. I don’t believe a single word coming from Hinkle. that’s my view
Yeah, I stand corrected, he has absolutely no principles lmao.