The more data we collect, the more we realize our assumptions about the universe may be incorrect. This is the first year data of a multi-year study on mapping the position of galaxies.
The more data we collect, the more we realize our assumptions about the universe may be incorrect. This is the first year data of a multi-year study on mapping the position of galaxies.
Again, these observation do not fit LCDM. (…but do fit my baby model ) … :
The following is what has been observed :
They still do not hypothesize that
baronicbarionic matter could be continually created as time goes on (which is what I say* ) but they do hypothesize that dark energy does change over time which is an equally hard hypothesis.*i say also that space develop exponantially at constant
matermatter (barionic) density.Edits :
typpotyposIf you aren’t familiar with it, you might want to look into Neil Turok’s theory:
https://insidetheperimeter.ca/a-mirror-universe-might-tell-a-simpler-story-neil-turok/
He and his coauthor have addressed a number of outstanding puzzles in cosmology with it, and of everything I’ve seen it’s where I’d put my money for future gains.
From your link :
I like it and I share his frustrations. Thanks for this article.
I like strong opinions, but you would sound more believable if uou made the effort to spell the critical terms correctly
English is not my first language. What blunder did I do ? I read everything again and I still don’t see it.