Link

What’s the US gonna do? Slink away in the middle of the night again?

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The US has never found a solution to the “what if we murder hundreds of thousands or even millions of civillians but they don’t surrender and keep fighting us?” Problem.

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Referring to people as “tankies”

    Openly cheerleading a military intervention and while directly acknowledging that the US’s stated goal of spreading democracy abroad is actually just a form of punishing politically opposed governments

    Someone tell me what’s going on here. Is it possible to go beyond lack of self-awareness into negative self-awareness?

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m writing a star trek parody with tankies called star tenk where the proton torpedoes are powered by releasing self-awareness and anti-self-awareness particles to blow up NATO imperialists.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    As predicted we really arrived at the point where “tankie” means just anyone who won’t bootlick US while emitting loud slurping sounds all over the internet.

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Remember when they fired that commander for actually giving a shit about his crew during one of the early COVID waves? Pinnacle of strategic thinking is turning your navy into coffin ships.

      • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Remember when they lost a war game against Iran so they called time out and just changed the rules to make themselves win?

        • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          IIRC, the rules they changed were that motorcycle messengers could instantly teleport across the map without being intercepted, and that the fleet of missile motorboats he was using to attack the US navy couldn’t actually mount the weapons they were previously allowed to, because the missiles alone were heavier than their actual maximum weight even without an attached launching system.

          Supposedly, a computer error also teleported the US fleet directly into motorboat range.

          It doesn’t really seem like losing a game against Iran rather than the game being extremely flawed.

          • nohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Which is its own kind of pathetic. Imagine running a simulation and you’ve not covered basic things like “causality” and “maximum parameter value means you can’t go above that number”.

            • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ve noted 40k has a rules commentary that has statements like that, and I know some gamer somewhere has had that conversation.

              I know I’ve seen “it doesn’t say anywhere that a model removed from play can’t act” in the wild, which I feel like is pushing the limits of semantic readability of game rules.

                • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I read a story on 40konline back in the day where someone placed a character on top of another model and then moved the other (much faster) model around. It’s pretty wild what shit people will pull.

                  If I’m doing tabletop rules writing, I try to be clear without getting trapped in the weeds of arguing with that sort of player. :/

              • GinAndJuche@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I know I’ve seen “it doesn’t say anywhere that a model removed from play can’t act” in the wild,

                Amazing

        • Tunnelvision [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It was also before the invention of hypersonic missiles, so the outcome would be even worse now. I don’t think Iran has them, but I wouldn’t doubt China or Russia would provide them.

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There were some legitimate problems with the millennium challenge but it’s still funny how it made them look bad and bootlickers get mad if you talk about it

    • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The mountains in Yemen are also 6000-8000 ft above sea level on average, while those in Vietnam were only 2000
      Pretty much every city is surrounded by 8000 ft mountains. Because if they weren’t, there’d be no rain there and there’d be no city in the first place

      And if there’s one thing that white people aren’t evolutionarily accustomed to, it’s mountains (and flavor and sugar and sunlight etc)