• QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    ~ 1/3 military kills is definitely not “indiscriminately killing”. These numbers change everything.

    It’s not a mass murder anymore. Oct7 was a justified targeted retaliation.

    -OP, 1 month ago

    Edit:

    Also most israeli civilians are IDF reservists so they are in fact uncounted soldiers. The IDF just called up 300.000 “innocent civilians” to commit genocide in Gaza? lmao.

    The best number is how little children were killed in compared to the total amount of people

    -Also OP, same thread

    Almost, forgot the most contradictory one of them all (emphasis mine):

    If they are IDF conscripts they’re not civilians. Don’t even dare to compare israeli colonists to Koreans.

    If people went into Hamas military service and become a “Hamas reservist” then you wouldn’t even doubt to call those people terrorists.

    There are actual israelis that rejected IDF service and even people that advocates for peace that were killed which is very sad. But the majority are military.

    Sauce

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yes only 36 children out of 1139 deaths does indicate that it was not indiscriminate murder. Do link the evidence presented that the IDF shelled the kibbutzes, festival and fleeing cards themselves too you conveniently left that out. And that we have no footage of Hamas shooting any children. And the fact that America has aroud 90% civilian casualties, three times high than oct7, even while including the IDF shelling civilians themselves.

      The other posts are still completely true. The only difference is that you do not understand where to draw the line.

      The line is drawn at not killing unarmed, non resisting people.

      If you disagree with my later comments of non-armed IDF reservists not being affiliated with the IDF then you can in no way justify israel bombing any target in Gaza which they suspect as a Hamas member if that person is not actively armed.

      For one second do this mental exersize:

      If a Hamas soldier went through a Hamas training camp and is a Hamas member on reserve duty but did not participate in the october 7 attacks, is the IDF justified in killing this person when he is not holding a weapon?