The Supreme Court on Tuesday passed up a chance to intervene in the debate over bathrooms for transgender students, rejecting an appeal from an Indiana public school district.

Federal appeals courts are divided over whether school policies enforcing restrictions on which bathrooms transgender students can use violate federal law or the Constitution.

In the case the court rejected without comment, the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order granting transgender boys access to the boys’ bathroom. The appeal came from the Metropolitan School District of Martinsville, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) southwest of Indianapolis.

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m 100% a supporter of trans right to use the bathroom of their gender.

    There is a reason that bathrooms are separated by gender.

    So if you can’t understand why people who don’t believe trans people exist are upset that people are using the wrong restroom, you’re just like the people who can’t understand that trans people exist: it’s a lack of being able to see beyond your own self and understand the position of others. While I strongly disagree with them, their position is not very complicated and easy to understand.

    • ferralcat@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I dont think there’s any need to give the benefit of the doubt to these people anymore. You might argue they believe LGBTQ people shouldn’t exist, and I might believe you, but I tend to think their main motivation is just stirring up anger and resentment against the “other side”.

      If people were concerned about privacy or safety, the us would have single user bathrooms or at least stalls that didn’t have 1in gaps around the doors (my 90s high school didn’t have stall doors at all, and in some bathrooms didn’t even have stalls, just a toilet next to the sink in the locker room). The same people aren’t upset about those things, because they don’t actually care about any of this.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I dont think there’s any need to give the benefit of the doubt to these people anymore.

        It’s troubling how often I come across the opinion now that one is free to believe the worst of anyone they want.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are urinals for women! They look kinda interesting. Not terribly common, but they are out there.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        The history of gendered bathrooms is no secret, if this is a good faith question, the answer is easily researched.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I know it and can find it. Howeve, I also don’t believe it to be a good faith question, and this response further confirms that suspicion.