• Corgana@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country isn’t the best movie in the lineup of Star Trek: The Original Series movies

    Is this engagement bait? TUC is almost always ranked first or second among ALL Trek films.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Classic click bait engagement … just post the opposite of popular opinion and people will flock to your part of the internet to disagree with you.

      They say it’s the best way to find solutions to common computer problems whether it’s Windows, Mac OS or Linux … just post the wrong answer or assumption and actual professionals or knowledgeable technicians will chime in to correct you. If you just plainly ask for help with a specific problem, you seldom get a response but if you touch on people’s sense of anger or negativity, they’re more likely to react.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The movie wasn’t that well-liked and wasn’t the perfect send-off for the original crew of Star Trek

      According to nobody, lmao

  • theinspectorst@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    The movie wasn’t that well-liked and wasn’t the perfect send-off for the original crew of Star Trek.

    What a weird thing to say. I’ve always heard it described as one of the best TOS films and I always found the ending quite an emotional and fitting send-off to the TOS crew.

      • fox2263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Interesting read. Half of that feels like the plot points of Picard season 3. Perhaps inspiration

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think the ending needs some work but I like the concept.

        I don’t know if the boomers could write a story about getting old wisely, particularly not way back then. I like the idea of showing different characters managing getting older, both in positive and negative ways, and perhaps some characters having an arc.

        Kirk would definitely be trying to keep living his glory days. He already looked like an idiot wrassling Klingons in Star Trek 3, by 6 he should be seeing the consequences of his insistence on playing hero, a washed up captain with a growing number of failed missions because he keeps trying to go down and fight the bad guy and kiss the lady and he just isn’t capable of it anymore. His arc would be learning to let go of the day to day battles, and leaning into his wisdom earned by a lifetime of work in the field to help raise the next generation of people who will be taking over after him. In the actual canon just as Kirk never faced the Kobayashi maru challenge head on, his character never actually faced aging head-on and died in a battle including 3 old men.

        The idea that McCoy would stop being a doctor is dumb, many doctors practice until they die of old age. His arc would be about coming to grips with the reality that he has a limited amount of time left and what that means.

        Spock would be an investigation of what it means to have more time since he’d be a young man in Vulcan terms, looking at aging from an alien perspective, but hey we introduced a new family member last movie how about we introduce sarek’s dad who is in the final stages of Vulcan decline and the consequences of having people be such reliable pillars for so long and then losing them.

        Scotty’s story of becoming a drunk stays, it’s too interesting to not do something with.

        Uhuras story should be a future reflection on a life for a woman that was much different than the life of a woman in the 60s when TOS first aired, an opportunity to show how different gene’s future was than the present of 40-60 years ago.

        Contrasting to Kirk who was the captain in his prime winning all the fights and getting all the chicks, Checkovs (sorry Koenig) character would be a reflection of a life of regret, of opportunities not taken. His arc would be about making peace with his past self and taking steps to constructively manage his future.

        Sulu could be shown taking an entirely different path, such as a strategic command, and his arc would be about using his wisdom and experience from the enterprise adventures to advise the fleet.

        With all this, I think two huge threats are too much. Galactic war or youth worms, and I think Galactic war makes way more sense for the last hurrah.

        You’d start off with a captains log and the on a routine mission to transport Spock in his role as a diplomat to mediate a dispute on a planet. Smash cut to a battle between Kirk and a klingon. The dialogue would suggest Kirk quickly sniffed him out with his experience, but while he puts up a good fight ultimately he loses the fight. He beams up and a space battle starts with a klingon ship. He issues competent commands and wins the battle but just a beat too late so the ship takes some hits and some people die. Later he’s admonished by Starfleet command and given an ultimatum that he either accepts a role as an admiral commanding fleets or he can retire, and he can make the decision when he gets back to earth but for now his first officer is in command of the ship. Just as they are about to set a course for earth they get a message that war has broken out with the Klingons and the Enterprise is needed immediately to participate in the war effort.

        Anyway better stop here or I’ll write a whole script lol

        • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          As for the story of the war and some of the characters stories… The age of heroes like Kirk in their prime is over, the federation is losing the war. Younger crews weren’t properly mentored and so lack the knowledge of the aging heroes and so are not doing well at all, and the older crews dont have the vigor to engage in total war. Meanwhile the Klingons seem to be doing just fine, being both vigorous and wise, hence why they decided to start a war sensing a weak federation. Kirk would slowly over the course of the movie learn that it’s not so bad mentoring top people. Bones would struggle after watching the young men come into the sickbay dead realizing in just a few years his final destination would be upon him, and he’d be making mistakes and cracking. Spock would share his struggles with his grandfather dying and would speak logically about death like nimoy did in “I am Spock” and it would help McCoy put death into perspective. Scott would learn he drank because he didn’t think he had anything better in his life until he saw the new batch of engineers trying really hard to keep the ship running but lacking know-how and one of the engineers would come to him with personal problems and he’d realize he had more to offer than just work. Spock would do some brilliant work as a seconded science officer and later would use his skills as a diplomat to help end the war with the Klingons once the Enterprise becomes the focal point of a passing of the torch where the old crews realize they need to build up the new ones which makes the Klingons realize their time has passed to attack (with a little prodding). Uhuras work as a communications officer ends up front and center as she is a second diplomat working with Spock near the end of the movie. Checkov would realize that while he isn’t happy with his past all he can do is move on to his future. Sulu would have a whole b-plot where he talks at desks about strategy and helps see several ambushes by the Klingons in advance which is part of what helps end the war.

          Ok but that’s it…

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    He was better in Babylon 5 anyway. He just felt like a Russian caricature in trek.

    • Oderus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is also true in the new Star Trek movies with Anton Yelchin. RIP kind soul.

      • richieadler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        And he knows it, and he’s grateful to have been able to give depth to Bester. He has said as much in interviews. As B5 fan, this makes me very happy.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can see why Koenig wasn’t really happy about his role. I can see why a lot of them weren’t.

    For Chekov, this isn’t a good posting for him. He is still a commander, and worse is that he is only second officer. It makes sense why Kirk is on the Enterprise still, but not Chekov. Worse, Chekov doesn’t really do that much. Functionally, Valeris seems to fill more of the role of second officer than Chekov does. Chekov’s most remembered line was only said by him because Nichols refused to say it.

    Both McCoy and Uhura display gross incompetence at their posts. McCoy has served as a doctor on the front line with Klingons around for decades; he should have been educated about their physiology. Uhura is even worse in not being able to speak Klingon; it is good that later versions of her character highlight her linguistic skills.

    Unless Starfleet is testing out new technology, it really doesn’t make sense that Scotty is the chief engineer of the Enterprise unless Starfleet is still pissed off about the Excelsior.

    Even though the movie was partially written by Nimoy, it really doesn’t make sense why Spock is still in Starfleet at this point at the rank of Captain. Either Spock should outrank Kirk since he is making Admiralty level decisions or already be in the diplomatic service as he is by the time of TNG.

    Only Kirk makes sense. He is a washed up Captain; never able to make it to bad admiral status. He gets to keep his ship, but Starfleet seems to use him as a pawn in diplomatic missions due to his noteriety with other powers.

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    He shouldn’t complain, at least they had his hair under control by then. Can’t say the same for TOS.