The subject is “sources of information” and, in this case, investigative journalists are a more reliable source of information than interrogators.
I’d say the same about any information leaked out of, say, Abu Ghraib back in the day. Show me what an independent source has to say and we’ll talk. Until then? Information gained under duress is suspect.
I like how he literally answered your question, with an answer that made perfect sense.
Gave resonas as to why this answer doesn’t exist yet.
And you still had the nerve to call it a defection. Pretty sure your goalposts don’t even exist at this point.
So going to a completely different subject works for you? Different strokes I guess.
It’s not a completely different subject.
The subject is “sources of information” and, in this case, investigative journalists are a more reliable source of information than interrogators.
I’d say the same about any information leaked out of, say, Abu Ghraib back in the day. Show me what an independent source has to say and we’ll talk. Until then? Information gained under duress is suspect.
Remember, anything that contradicts your preferred narrative should be charged as suspect.
Sorry to break it to you but you Hamas is nearly done.