• _e____b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never said that the title is wrong, or the content is wrong. I just wanted to highlight that the focus should be on the “act” (eating) and not on the “being” (vegan vs not-vegan). The graph you’ve pasted would look friendlier if instead of saying “meat-eaters” … “vegans”, would say something like “high meat consumption” … “100% plant based”. Grouping the actions and not the people.

    • Risk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This seems needlessly pedantic, presumably because of a similar argument as the other commenter - that veganism is a philosophy and not just a diet. However, as the other commenter highlighted, veganism begets a vegan diet.

      You also don’t have to follow an entirely vegan philosophy to follow a strict vegan diet.

      Not to mention “100% plant based” implies you don’t eat fungi!

      • _e____b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that it might be pedantic to some, but I think it is important to strive for a clear message.

        You also don’t have to follow an entirely vegan philosophy to follow a strict vegan diet.

        That’s the point I wanted to make on my original comment.

        Not to mention “100% plant based” implies you don’t eat fungi!

        Yeah, my examples didn’t want to be the definitive nomenclature.