• pancake@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, to be fair there are indeed enough houses… We kinda just assumed they would, by the grace of the market, end up distributed among virtually all people and at a fair price. The reason they never did and increasingly don’t is one of the largest unsolved problems in economics /s

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We know what the problem is, and how to solve it. The people in charge just don’t want it solved.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is so weird, isn’t it? I reran the model thousand times, it can’t be wrong! I mean, what’s supposed to be wrong? The assumptions? That’s ridiculous! Let me readjust the factors once more…

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The houses aren’t in the right place where people need them, however. Where are there millions of unoccupied homes in California, Oregon and Washington?

      Oregon alone is short something like 150,000 housing units. I can’t ever recall seeing an empty house that stayed vacant for very long.