The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWho wouldn't want to finance warm cardboard?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageWho wouldn't want to finance warm cardboard?lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareRayston@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year ago…thats literally what capitalism always does. manipulate the government for economic and political support. Thats like capitalism 101.
minus-squarediprount_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoSource: your left ball
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoSource: United States vs FEC
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou’ve got a search engine
minus-squarediprount_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoI’ve got some, and none of them drops good results on this
minus-squarebiddy@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThey meant Citizens United v. FEC, a supreme court case that allowed much more election advertising.
…thats literally what capitalism always does. manipulate the government for economic and political support. Thats like capitalism 101.
Source: your left ball
Source: United States vs FEC
TF is that?
You’ve got a search engine
I’ve got some, and none of them drops good results on this
They meant Citizens United v. FEC, a supreme court case that allowed much more election advertising.