ShaggySnacks to simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agoI Quote This Line Dailyimagemessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down10
arrow-up1102arrow-down1imageI Quote This Line DailyShaggySnacks to simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square2linkfedilink
minus-squarevettnerk@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-22 years agoI had to look that up, because of reasons, and according to myshakespeare.com that line reads " That has no relish of salvation in’t." However, line 87 simply states “no” Not quite sure of what to make of it.
minus-squareloaExMachina@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareThenThreeMore@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoThe second quarto and first folio have quite significant differences from each other and are both fair a bit longer than the first quarto. So depending on how the edition you’re looking at has been edited lines could easily fall in different places.
I had to look that up, because of reasons, and according to myshakespeare.com that line reads " That has no relish of salvation in’t."
However, line 87 simply states “no”
Not quite sure of what to make of it.
deleted by creator
The second quarto and first folio have quite significant differences from each other and are both fair a bit longer than the first quarto. So depending on how the edition you’re looking at has been edited lines could easily fall in different places.