ShaggySnacks to simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoI Quote This Line Dailylemmy.myserv.oneimagemessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down10
arrow-up1101arrow-down1imageI Quote This Line Dailylemmy.myserv.oneShaggySnacks to simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squarevettnerk@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agoI had to look that up, because of reasons, and according to myshakespeare.com that line reads " That has no relish of salvation in’t." However, line 87 simply states “no” Not quite sure of what to make of it.
minus-squareloaExMachina@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoMaybe some things count as lines in some editions and not in others ?
minus-squareThenThreeMore@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThe second quarto and first folio have quite significant differences from each other and are both fair a bit longer than the first quarto. So depending on how the edition you’re looking at has been edited lines could easily fall in different places.
I had to look that up, because of reasons, and according to myshakespeare.com that line reads " That has no relish of salvation in’t."
However, line 87 simply states “no”
Not quite sure of what to make of it.
Maybe some things count as lines in some editions and not in others ?
The second quarto and first folio have quite significant differences from each other and are both fair a bit longer than the first quarto. So depending on how the edition you’re looking at has been edited lines could easily fall in different places.