• NoDoy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chalk me up as one of the folks that was adamant this was due to an API mismatch.

    Yikes. Low benchmarks in the case of everyday Pixel usage isn’t a big deal, but prohibiting the installation without reason will make this a bigger deal than it needs to be. And I can’t fault users for feeling that way.

    • ijeff@lemdro.idOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s a pretty bad look. Benchmarks aren’t a big deal, but folks should be informed before ordering.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have an upvote for coming back and acknowledging the mistake. We all get to miss the mark sometimes.

      That said, your approach is really the better one - wait until we know for sure before condemning. (Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by basic human stupidity).

    • Jesus_666@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      “undertaken by Google to stop reviewers, if not or at least make it more difficult, for reviewers to from easily installing

      That’s still not great. You still end up with “make it more difficult from installing”. How about “…undertaken by Google to make it impossible, or at least more difficult, for reviewers to install…”?

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, something like that. I didn’t want to rework the entire sentence but it’s so awkward.