• Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All BEVs from everyone will have the same issues.

    EDIT: Lying to yourself will not change reality. A BEV will never be a low-resource type of vehicles. It is a matter of when, not if, it falls apart as an idea.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Explain to me how a car with a $20,000 battery can ever avoid a repair job of $20,000 once the battery dies? This is a problem that everyone will face.

        And in America, the land of SUVs and pick-up trucks, these costs will be even higher.

        EDIT: You won’t change economics by lying to yourself. BEVs are simply not viable. At least, not anything with a big battery.

        • bob_lemon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t about the battery dying. It’s about Tesla failing miserably at building a water resistant enclosure for their batteries, them pretending that it’s somehow the customers fault.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s both about the shittiness of Tesla, and the eventually doom of all BEVs. If you think companies like Ford or VW won’t be building shit BEVs too, then I have a bridge to sell to you.

            EDIT: Again, no amount of lying to yourself or others will save the BEV. It is doomed and always will be. If anything, you are just delaying real solutions to climate change.

              • Hypx@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                Joe Biden just announced a huge pro-hydrogen program? Is he paid off or insane?

                It’s time to ask yourself honestly: Why do you oppose green technology that happens to not be your favored technology? Perhaps you can reach a realization here.

                  • Hypx@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Basically every left-leaning politician on Earth would have be too, in your mind.

                • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because hydrogen isn’t as green as you might think.

                  Most ways of creating hydrogen involve toxic chemicals that pollute almost as much as ICE cars.

                  And the green ways of creating it lose about 30% of the energy put into it. Energy that could have been used to … charge a battery directly.

                  • Hypx@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    And there’s one way to get to zero emissions. Just like a BEV. The criticism is just a lot of BS from BEV companies.

                    Neither wind nor solar is all that efficient. Why hasn’t anyone on the left come out and vigorous oppose them?

                    Because that’s stupid, and frankly it is just climate change denial at this point. Something you are doing now.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Explain to me how a car with a $20,000 battery can ever avoid a repair job of $20,000 once the battery dies?

          It is quite easy.

          A battery like that lasts longer than the car. It may not have done in the past, but it does do so today.

          And if it breaks before then, you only need to replace a single cell to fix it.

          Afterwards, you can just recycle and reuse those exotic metals used in its construction, so it doesn’t require more pollution to create.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Much of that is wishful thinking. All batteries will die, and the repair cost will be insane. Not to mention it all applies to FCEVs and at a much lower cost and lower resource base.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fundamentally, you can’t. The same as how a gas car can’t avoid a $5k transmission or engine replacement. Cars being totaled due to their most expensive part failing isn’t really a new thing or unexpected. Beaters are sold for scrap literally every day because it’s not worth repairing them.

          All cars have a limited lifetime. For ICE cars, that’s on average around 12 years, and things often start going wrong around ~150k miles. You can get particularly well-maintained cars to last much longer, but most people don’t. Classic cars are mostly a hobbyist thing for a reason.

          The question isn’t “will the battery eventually die”, its “will the battery last 15-20 years while still having 60-80% of its initial capacity?”

          And based on real-world data, the answer appears to be “yes, unless you have a lemon or really abuse your battery.” Lemons are also nothing new.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can repair ICE cars. Unless you bought some complex luxury car, ICE cars are very cheap to maintain.

            FCEVs will have something similar. They will be cheap to build and maintain. They do not have a giant battery to replace.

            • ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You? Lmao, nope. Gotta pay big bucks if you want new cars repaired. Pay a couple thousand upfront and then another couple thousand every year for new vehicle information. You can thank John Deere for that shift. I know, your car currently runs. For Americans, there is a certain point in buying a newer one is cheaper than repairing it. There will be a point where everyone is forced to have a shittier car because they are either all like that or you pay the big bucks. What are Americans going to do? Not buy cars, they don’t have the freedom to not have one.

        • ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not one giant battery, but arrays of smaller batteries. At least that has been my experience with them. Battery goes bad and you replace that array. Not 20k but closer to 2k.

    • Blue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lying to yourself will not change reality. A cellphone will never be a low-resource type of communication. It is a matter of when, not if, it falls apart as an idea.

      Lying to yourself will not change reality. A personal computer will never be a low-resource type of device. It is a matter of when, not if, it falls apart as an idea.

      That is you, that is how deranged you sound.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        A cellphone is not a car. Nor is a personal computer.

        A BEV has fundamental problems that cannot be solved. It’s worth noting that they are an older idea than combustion cars. It is in many ways, totally obsolete.

        • Blue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok I stand corrected, you definitely are deranged or you are literally a paid shill of Exxon, which in this case would be the same thing.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So when Joe Biden announces a huge pro-hydrogen program, is he a paid shill of Exxon?

            Honestly, some of you guys are so deluded, it goes beyond projecting. You guys are seriously brainwashed by Musk. Some of you will sell out the entirety of the climate change movement if it means validation by a Fascist.

            • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              lol we hate Musk. We dont like Teslas shitty cars. We do like EVs since they keep the air pollution outside of big cities and if used with renewable energies they are the best alternative to fossil fuel car travel we have.

                • Pipoca@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The problem with FCEVs right now is cost.

                  First of all, we already have good electric distribution infrastructure, but don’t have an industrially-sized hydrogen distribution infrastructure. It’s way easier to install a new charging site than a new hydrogen refueling site. Building hydrogen out will be expensive, unless you’re talking about vehicles with a centralized depot, like busses or ferries.

                  Second, fuel cells aren’t really that efficient right now, and neither is electrolysis. Due to losses at each step, 100 miles worth of green hydrogen is way, way more expensive than 100 miles worth of electricity.

                  With more research, that could change. But for now, there’s a reason you don’t see many FCEVs.

                  • Hypx@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The same story was said about wind, solar, even BEVs too. They all had to be expensive before they hit mass production.

                    But the advantage of FCEVs is that they have very low resource requirements. The cost floor is much below that of BEVs. Eventually, they will be as cheap as ICE cars or less, and the fuel will be cheaper than gasoline.

                    The efficiency argument is hugely exaggerated and is mostly coming from BEV companies. Even if you believe it, you should be aware that photovoltaics are terribly inefficient. But it doesn’t matter because solar is made from sand and sunlight is everywhere. Hydrogen has the same idea going for it. Made from water and renewable energy, it too will be extremely cheap.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Funny, cause an combustion car has a lot bigger issues that can not be fixed and need to be addressed right now.

          Which shares the same problems with hydrogen cars, btw.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            FCEVs don’t have the problem of combustion cars. It is the natural follow-up to them.