• *Tagger*@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am sorry, I thought I’d read that it was a massive loss leader for Google, but in looking for a source I’ve learnt it is actually very profitable.

    I think my reaction stems from the way, many people on Lemmy seem to point to piracy as a solution to everything that streaming and gaming companies do. In fairness, I think in this case I may be unfairly lumping people in with that crowd.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, piracy is one of the very very few ways we have of fighting back, ad blocking fits the same description.

      I’m kind of confused how you could have possibly believed youtube wasn’t profitable. There probably has never been anything as close to as popular for video entertainment no matter how you slice it, and it’s globally popular too. Even if they made .000000001 cent per video view, they’d still probably be printing money.

      • *Tagger*@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought I’d read that due to the massive expense of hosting the sheer amount of data, particularly when large placentals of the days is watched 1 or 2 times meant that it had been large overheads.