China’s foreign minister said Saturday that Israel has gone too far in responding to last week’s invasion by Hamas, China’s official news agency reported.

Speaking to Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Israel’s actions have extended beyond self-defense.

According to Xinhua, China has an interest in helping resolve the conflict and the underlying issues involving the Palestinian population.

  • wildginger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You don’t need evidence because we are not beholden to you.

    Oops, someone tell the handler youve slipped lip a bit.

    So, what youre saying is there were definitely terrorists but they refuse to prove it, but they had to massacre everyone there to deal with the terrorists that tooooootally were there, so it wasnt war crimes because of the evidence you definitely have but refuse to show?

    Or in other words… Proof of a terror attack would exonerate china of the event and completely embarass all of its global rivals. Instead of rubbing everyones nose in it, they are actively hiding and suppressing any discussion of the terrorists.

    Because they arent real. They dont exist. And if china lets that out, they have to admit they murdered their own people over nothing.

    E: the US did loads of “inside job” investigations. They published a good deal of it. You should google it, its an interesting read

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are lots of photos of burnt out armor from the protestors attacks by western journalists.

      Their argument is if you see those images of destroyed armor taken by foreign nationals and still think that some how China did it, well fuck you. You’re too god damn stupid to talk to.

      • wildginger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Where on those images does it show they were damaged by non chinese weaponry?

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What are you talking about, of course they were damaged with Chinese weaponry. They’re in China. I already told you at the time weapons weren’t as restricted, the people got access to Chinese weaponry. Why the fuck would Chinese protestors use other weaponry?

          *Edit: Did you know BLM protestors used AR-15s? Where was the non-American weaponry? No PROOF THEREFORE BLM DIDN’T HAPPEN. You absolute dunce.

          • wildginger
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For fucks sake dude, obviously I mean proper noun china, in contrast to the imaginary terrorists.

            Could you pick typing, or huffing glue? You get to do 1. Either turn off your computer, or go put the fucking glue away.

            • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Chinese people used Chinese weapons yes. Just like Americans user AR-15s. What is your point?

              • wildginger
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                AR15s are not trademarked US weaponry. An AR15 is not proof of american military presence. Its just a gun.

                Do I need to dumb down questions for you? Should I avoid big boy words?

                • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  … Are you dumb? AR-15 is the civilian moniker for M-16. You know that right? There’s no way to distinguish the damage they do from one another.

                  • wildginger
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You genuinely have no idea what you were asked, and its so fucking funny.

                    Its like someone told me they trained their dog really well, so I tell the dog (you) to fetch a ball. And the dog (you) keeps trying to put its paw in my hand. No you dumb dog! Fetch!

                    Im not using complex ideas, Im speaking in simple sentences, Im repeating myself for you when you fuck up, and you still dont grok a thing.

                    “Hurrr, but AR? But AR? That merica weapon? Weapon, in merica? AR? It M16? Hurr? What was question?”