I guess not strictly news - but with all of the vitriol I have seen in discussions on the Israel situation, that have boiled down to arguments over wording, I feel that this take from the BBC is worthy of some discussion.

Mods, feel free to remove if this is not newsy enough.

  • Evia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, it’s announcing their cowardice. They use ‘terrorist’ for any other non-Israel/Palestine attack (9/11, London Bridge, 7/7, etc) so the entire argument is invalid.

    The lawyers told them not to because everyone’s scared of being called anti-semitic, that’s all

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I approve of it. Terrorist is a loaded term designed to draw an emotional response from the reader. Every nation could be called a terrorist organization. Any rebellion could be called terrorists. It’s not a useful term. It’s especially not useful in this case because the number killed by Israel is so much higher than Hamas.

      Terrorist is generally just a term used to describe those without power using the tools of their oppressor against them. Fear and violence are only “allowed” to be used if you’re the one with power, for whatever reason. It’s stupid.

      Domestic attacks and attacks against allies will be called terrorist attacks obviously, because they see value in supporting the status quo.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lawyers told them not to because everyone’s scared of being called anti-semitic, that’s all

      Honest question, how would labelling the Hamas as terrorists get them to be called anti-semitic?

      Anti-semitic, as far as I know, means “against Jews” both in academics and colloquially. Hamas aren’t Jews.

      Maybe you meant something like islamophobe instead?