• nul9o9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I took my first landlord to court because they kept my deposit and didn’t give me an itemized list of deductions from it. They had three weeks to do so after I surrendered the property.

    The god damn judge ruled in their favor because they said that the three weeks started when the original lease ended, not when I dropped off the keys to this office. This was almost 10 years ago and it still puts me in a bad mood.

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 months ago

      That sounds like the stupidest possible interpretation of anything. That judge needs to find a new job

      • nul9o9@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Oh believe me. I came prepared with the state codes concerning renters rights and all that.

        The judge asked me to explain why I think I deserve treble the amount of my deposit as damages. I had to reference the code number to this judge, and the assistant next to him had to tell him I was right.

        Guess which part of the code I didn’t think I needed to print out, the part where it defines the time line of when the itemized list of deductions was due. 😤

    • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Was the end of the original lease later? Couldn’t you just sue again once those three weeks were up?