• maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Liberalism is the founding basis of modern Western democracy. So not quite the same as an obscure fact about a species of tree.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Obscure fact” is a weird way to say “literally the defining characteristics.”

      But you’re right, it’s far, far more embarrassing for an American to not be able to define liberal, or at least vaguely recognize its meaning in this context.

      • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Liberal, in US English, is almost solely used to describe left of center politics. For the definition of liberal that you’re referring to the common term is Libertarian.

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The trouble I have with a definition like that is that it raises another question: what’s ‘center’?

          And if you define that by a point between hard right and hard left, then as the right goes even farther into their own reactionary bubble, diving even farther right, the “center” skews to the right to account for it.

          • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There really hasn’t been much change in the hard right and hard left in the United States through its history. We’ve just fluctuated back and forth on what parts you dare say out loud.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Leaving aside for the moment that the most common “libertarian” identifies as a “classical liberal” how do you people keep having dumber takes?

          • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You aren’t exactly a novel contributor to the broader discussion either. All you are doing is claiming shit, not backing anything up, and telling others to Google it while being a snide and condescending prick.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just ignore him. He is the type of dude that thinks arguing about the prescriptive versus descriptive use of the word “literally” is a personality.