alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoNorth Korea celebrated its founding with a military parade featuring dump trucks modified to work as rocket launcherswww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1529arrow-down114
arrow-up1515arrow-down1external-linkNorth Korea celebrated its founding with a military parade featuring dump trucks modified to work as rocket launcherswww.businessinsider.comalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year ago it wasn’t even one event. Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war
minus-squareTheChurn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-21 year ago Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war Did you miss the part where the first such event didn’t take place until after the invasion by the North?
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoNope. That’s like saying the Emancipation Proclamation couldn’t have motivated any sides in the Civil War because it happened halfway through.
minus-squareTheChurn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoThe comment I replied to said this: This was the instigating event behind the civil war. Dictionary.com says this for the word “instigating” Causing, initiating, responsible for Please explain how an event that occured after the invasion was the cause or initiator of the war. If you cannot, then admit you didn’t read the thread and just came in here to muddy the waters. If you are too proud to admit that, just ghost.
minus-square🏳️⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoI didn’t claim they were correct. If you look above, I made a weaker claim than they did. that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war
Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war
Did you miss the part where the first such event didn’t take place until after the invasion by the North?
Nope. That’s like saying the Emancipation Proclamation couldn’t have motivated any sides in the Civil War because it happened halfway through.
The comment I replied to said this:
Dictionary.com says this for the word “instigating”
Please explain how an event that occured after the invasion was the cause or initiator of the war.
If you cannot, then admit you didn’t read the thread and just came in here to muddy the waters.
If you are too proud to admit that, just ghost.
I didn’t claim they were correct. If you look above, I made a weaker claim than they did.