Doesn’t even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is what you get for running two genocidaires.

        Ahhh there it is… Finally getting honest are we?

              • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 minutes ago

                Obviously that is a larger factor for mainstream American acceptance than distant genocide. Most voters have no concept of political theory or world events.

    • redhat421@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m mad at the Democrats for under signing a genocide thus disaffecting their would be voters.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        the world is not binary. there are many people who bare part of the responsibility:

        • the republican party - all of them
        • republican voters
        • the democratic party
        • no-voters (who didn’t want to “support genocide” and now you have a worse genocide and a bunch of other horrible shit including a shit load of extra war crimes in ukraine for the foreseeable future)
        • the media

        these and many more can have played a part all at the same time

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            it’s worth calling out all on their own because it surfaces a specific problem… just saying “billionaires ruin everything” isn’t helpful, because it simply shifts blame to a nebulous concept that’s further removed from everyday people

            also, following orders is no excuse

            • Landless2029@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’s valid.

              There used to be laws to force news stations to be bipartisan and show both sides.

              Copypasta:

              The “Fairness Doctrine,” which once required broadcasters to present contrasting viewpoints on controversial issues, was eliminated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1987.

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 minutes ago

                Most of them now seem to follow a fucked-up interpretation of the Fairness Doctrine that requires them to always give the impression that there are no meaningful differences between the parties, which translates into painting Republicans as a perfectly normal, reasonable political party.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ikr, so hard to blame the republicans and the people who didn’t vote for the shit us is in rn /s