• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hence why “radicalise the populace” is a phrase that makes sense.

        The populace, containing many people who are radicalised and many others who are not radicalised, may become further radicalised by gaining a higher proportion of radicalised people in response to state repression.

        If the populace and the radicals were the same set of people, then there would be no further radicalisation possible.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It won’t galvanize the protestors, that’s for sure.

      Unfortunately, abusers don’t care about bravery or persistence. They only respond to force, and if the abused doesn’t have the force necessary to topple their abusers, they will continue to get abused.

      It’s really that simple. But yeah, thoughts and prayers. NO FOREIGN INTERVENTION. Just thoughts and prayers <3

      • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you really want NATO to dismantle the government and then leave the country to sort its own shit out? Have you seen Iraq, Libya, or Afghanistan recently?

        The West generally lacks the public support necessary for an occupation of the length it would take to rebuild Iran. The international community has no appetite for NATO backed regime change.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, I want them to slowly and steadily build and fortify settlements where people can live free from the oppressive regime.

          Taking the entire country at once is asinine. Build smaller settlements within it to slowly change the culture over generations.

          It won’t be easy, but it’s the only viable solution unless a cultural shift happens from within (it won’t.)

          Wake me up when these problems get solved doing something I don’t suggest.

          • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’d have to take the land first, which means dismantling the government, which means having to occupy the nation.

            There’s no such thing as a fortified settlement in a world where artillery and precision guided munitions exist.

            • bobman@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure there is, lol.

              Find a place where people welcome intervention and go from there. Start small and build out over time. Will it happen without violence? Unlikely, but I’m interested to see if the problems ever get solved doing something I don’t suggest.

              Let me know when that happens. I can wait.

              • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                What you are suggesting would require defeating in detail the military of Iran, which would need to be followed by an occupation of the country likely against a well armed, trained, and motivated resistance.

                Countries don’t tend to take losing parts of themselves too kindly, it is not possible to “start small and build out from there”.

                What you are suggesting is frankly not a very well thought out idea, so the smarmy “LOL LET ME KNOW WHEN THAT WORKS” just comes across as immature.

                Let me know when you come up with a better idea than “huge conflict that will kill hundreds of thousands at best and continue without end for decades”. I can wait.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Conservatism is a plague of oppression and death. It always has been.

    The U.S. caused this conservative end-game for the Iranian people. The U.S. should remove these oonservatives from power and give the government back to the normal people.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It actually was quite nice. It was socially progressive and had respected universities, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, women’s rights and was even quite respected for its art. It was a vacation destination for many westerners.

        Unfortunately, it also had oil and you know how American conservatives are about oil. They absolutely wrecked Iran’s government in an attempt to aquire their oil, manipulating the locals into installing a conservatave government.

        What you see there today is a conservative win-condition; a hellscape of oppression, sickness and death. This is a glimpse at our future in the U.S. if conservatives have their way.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately, it also had oil and you know how American conservatives are about oil.

          Pretty sure US never had access to Iranian oil reserves.

            • bobman@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay? That means it’s impossible to intervene with positive results, right?

              It’s a literal rule of the universe, lol.

              • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The US having involvement in Iran’s oil in the past has nothing to do with future positive results from whatever intervention you are suggesting.

                I’m not sure what you are so upset about. You made a false statement minimizing US involvement in the creation of Iran’s current conservative hellscape and I replied with factual data showing US involvement. Conservatism is a plague of oppression. You should not defend conservatives. They do not need or deserve your defense.

                If by “intervention” you mean invading Iran to liberate the citizens, I really don’t know if that would be successful or not. Maybe it would be.

                The citizens certainly need saving. But, I suspect US conservatives would be very opposed to an invasion to liberate people who are suffering (conservatives prefer that people suffer). I also suspect non-conservatives (normal people) in the US will be resistant to invading a country for any reason at all, based on past sentiments. So, even if an invasion would be successful, I doubt it could happen. That’s why I think their best hope is revolution without intervention.

                • bobman@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hey man, wake me up when these problems get solved doing something I don’t suggest.

                  I can wait.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But no foreign aid, right?

      Brown people have to solve their own problems? Even if it doesn’t work?

      • trebor8201@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Short of a military invasion, how might we send aid to the people of Iran protesting their own government?

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It will take military intervention.

          It’s either that or we do nothing effective.

          Wake me up when this problems get solved with something else.