• Corngood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    This was such a huge own goal. They need to fix this asap.

    I’m not saying put things back the way they were, but stop the disincentive for real news. Maybe tax social media and subsidise journalism, or otherwise regulate them in some way.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Facebook was always crap. It’s a propaganda tool masquerading as enterprise.

      Maybe tax social media and subsidise journalism, or otherwise regulate them in some way.

      That’s what they did.

      • Corngood@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        No, they tried to tax links to news, so facebook just took the links away.

        I’m saying tax or regulate the platform itself.

        Edit: to give a practical example off the top of my head: tariff foreign advertising services targeting Canadians (or even more broadly), use that to subsidise media.

    • SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      People need to seperate what happened to quantify the win and losses of the actions.

      The original bill was intended for news corporation to get a fair cut for their content. Even with just Google signing on for a 100 million was a significant success.

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/google-online-news-act-exemption-1.7422690

      For accessibility to news. Having less access to news for people always a bad thing. Having little to no regulations for modern media has also been a huge failure for almost all governments globally.