• tasty4skin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    since when are religiously motivated killings “content”? same goes for fatwas. obviously i was referring to online content, specifically the trash found here and on /r/atheism

    • richieadler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Define “trash”. I suspect your definition is equally quaint.

      • tasty4skin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        can you define quaint? bc it doesn’t seem like your intention lines up with its meaning

        • richieadler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m being facetious. Believers like you complaining about atheists while enjoying a position of privilege are perfect targets for mockery.

          • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The person started by saying they were not religious. Feels like you’re just looking to offend some religious people… on an atheist community. Kinda proving their point there bud.

            • tasty4skin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              exactly my point. the atheism subreddit used to be exactly like this too. it’s chock full of anti-religious circlejerkers that want nothing but to own believers and it’s just pure brainrot.

              but that’s my problem with the current state of lemmy in general. it seems like there’s a lot of reactionary bullshit and no actual discussion. people will just assume that you believe certain things if you disagree with what they’re saying.

      • tasty4skin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        while you’re defining quaint, have a go at defining “content” and make sure it includes fatwas and religious killings, since you consider those to be content.

        or perhaps you’re just circlejerking with the other antitheists here and it doesn’t matter as long as God bad Science good.

        • richieadler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          or perhaps you’re just circlejerking with the other antitheists here and it doesn’t matter as long as God bad Science good.

          Maybe. But given that we’re not wrong, I don’t care if you’re offended.