Skavau@lemm.eeM to Television@lemm.eeEnglish · 8 days agoWas a TV show you like ever ruined by the addition of a particular character to the point that you had to quit, or nearly quit?message-squaremessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down12
arrow-up149arrow-down1message-squareWas a TV show you like ever ruined by the addition of a particular character to the point that you had to quit, or nearly quit?Skavau@lemm.eeM to Television@lemm.eeEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareWindex007@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 days agoAlso wasn’t he originally written as being independently wealthy? I think that aspect was also lost in the character transition.
minus-squaremutual_ayed@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·8 days agoYup, from rich ladies man to slob, and he didn’t even have the excuse of having kids! He had three money no kids!
minus-squarenaeap@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 days agoUpvoted for the much appreciated Simpsons reference
Also wasn’t he originally written as being independently wealthy? I think that aspect was also lost in the character transition.
Yup, from rich ladies man to slob, and he didn’t even have the excuse of having kids! He had three money no kids!
Upvoted for the much appreciated Simpsons reference