• Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    the Russia has been steadily and slowly gaining territory over the last year with a speed of 0.7 % of Ukraine’s territory per year. Which is not strategically relevant. Strategically seen, the Russia has not advanced.

    I don’t really see China starting to actively cover the Russian budget. That would jeopardize China’s trade with Europe.

    The Russia’s strategy has been to outlast Ukraine’s supporters will to support Ukraine. That will never happen, unless the voices making the fake claims about time being on the Russia’s side are given too much space. Helping Ukraine is so much cheaper than the costs that incur if the Russia takes over Ukraine that there is no logical reason for the EU to end Ukraine’s support ever. Even if some countries were to withdraw their support, enough will retain it to keep Ukraine’s head over water.

    The Russian economy will collapse, sooner or later.

    • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The Russian economy will collapse, sooner or later.

      I agree, but think it’s later. Russia needs to lose on the battlefield as well before they stop the war.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If it’s a year later, then it is. The Russia won’t be able to recruit soldiers after its economy collapses. They are in for salary and death compensation that is defined in Rubles. Once the Ruble compensation loses its value, relatives get less motivated for letting their sons go to the front. And when the 2000$ salary becones a 100 $ salary, nobody goes to war for that money.

        Without soldiers the front cannot be kept.