After the original mod being inactive for so long, i’ve asked the db0 mods for me to take this community. So, welcome back!

Rules

This includes the instance rules of dbzer0, which can be tl;dr’d to: no right wing nutjobs or tankies are allowed. As for the community rules:

  1. Be nice
  2. No bigotry/prejudice
  3. No tankies/right wingers
  4. Don’t promote proprietary software
  5. Stay on topic
  6. No crypto
  7. Don’t be a smartass and try to game the system, we’ll know if you’re breaking the rules when we see it!
  8. If you post news exclusive to a country please name it. (This isn’t a bannable rule, but just a recommendation :) )

Why not:

Lemmy.ml

.ml is infamous for banning pretty much anyone they please. This community, while left libertarian, will allow conflicting viewpoints.

Lemmy.world

.world is too big, and has centralized a decentralized community. It simply does not fit, and is a net negative for the fediverse as a whole.


I will be creating a wiki/guide for this community later on, but i’m currently busy.

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Regarding rule 3, what about things like VPN and email services that have proprietary components?

    • fxomt@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exceptions may be made, such as source available/some proprietary components but promoting completely proprietary software is not allowed

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mullvad has wireguard, and a open source client but the backend code is closed source. Would that be allowed?

        Is there anything in privacy guides that wouldn’t be allowed?

        • fxomt@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          MV Is fine since it’s trustworthy. As for PrivacyGuides the only thing that is not allowed is the crypto section.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            There is only one crypto recommend, monero. But that is totally open source.

            Should there be another community rule to explicitly forbid crypto discussion?

            Ex Mullvad accepts crypto payments, that might come up in a discussion as well

            • fxomt@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Its of the instance rules, but I will add an explicit rule forbidding it.

              Monero is the best of the worst, but it’s still crypto, and damages the environment heavily (it also has the downside of attracting alt right users, so that’s a no go)

      • novacomets
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        That sounds like one of those internet-only words from people who are socially crippled and live exclusively on the internet and not enough time outside meeting atrangers to socialize

        • Evotech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Want much internet in 1956, but yeah

          I hadn’t heard it before I joined Lemmy either.

          Well now you know

        • fxomt@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s a real term dating back to 1956, and it’s a bannable offense by instance rules.

          The instance’s rules are:

          • Nothing positive or promoting cryptocurrency, blockchain or NFTs
          • Nothing extreme-right-wing. This includes conspiracy theories, SovCit, Pro-Police, AnCaps etc. We’ll know it when I see it, don’t test us!
          • No anti-science topics.
          • No Tankie shit.
          • No TERFs.
          • No Porn.
          • novacomets
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It sounds like essentially “Do not post anything that expresses a different opinion.” and the “No anti-science topics” sounds like “Do not post documentation that proves our belief is false or wrong.”

            • fxomt@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Just don’t bootlick regimes, is it that hard?

              And no anti science doesn’t mean spiritual stuff and such, it means doing shit like denying vaccines or being a QAnon nut job. There’s even a Catholic comm on the instance.

              You’re complicating this for nobody but yourself.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          That sounds like a bad faith answer to begin with.

          But it’s a term used for at least half a century. In the context of Lemmy, you’ll likely be seen as a tankie of you:

          • Use every opportunity to promote China or Russia and/or claim China/Russia is truly socialist
          • Throw tantrums at everyone who is not far left
          • Advocate for authoritarian left regimes
  • fxomt@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Question: What do we do with hexbear users? i don’t want this to become .ml again, so do we:

    • Do we tolerate them, and if they cause any ruckus, permaban?
    • Just ban them all?
    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Banning by instance achieves nothing but further alienation.

      Let them be, just don’t hesitate to ban those who poison the conversation.