Summary

Canadian leaders, particularly Ontario Premier Doug Ford, are considering retaliatory measures against Trump’s tariff threats, including restricting U.S. alcohol imports and cutting electricity exports to 1.5 million American homes.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has remained relatively calm despite Trump’s provocations, but Ontario’s response signals rising tensions.

Analysts warn that Trump’s tariff policies could provoke significant economic retaliation from Canada, disrupting key cross-border energy supplies and trade.

The situation highlights the potential fallout from escalating U.S.-Canada trade disputes under the incoming administration.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    True. And there’s only so much the US can do. At the end of the day, OPEC can just raise or lower production to destroy any US policy.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We’re a net exporter of oil now - 10.15 million bbl per day vs 8.51 imported. And now only 16% of that comes from OPEC countries vs 52% from Canada. tl;dr OPEC has nowhere near the influence on our oil prices it once had.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The margin of profit on tar sands oil is razor thin. So Canada needs to be kept happy or we’re back under Saudi Arabias sway. Trump will not keep Canada happy.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Maybe not the same influence they once had, but every one of those producers can destroy the market on their own if they wanted to. That said, oil will overall be far less important over the coming decades as transportation and manufacturing move away from fossil fuels. Europe is very far along the way on that already.

        • enbyecho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “…but every one of those producers can destroy the market on their own if they wanted to.”

          Depending on what you mean by “destroy the market” that doesn’t make any sense.

          The rest I totally agree with.

          • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What I mean by that is that if OPEC (or any of the other big producers) decided to cut all of their production for a long period of time (e.g. a year), it would completely destroy the world market and the other players would be able to do nothing about it. It would simply take so much supply away that prices would go crazy.

            • enbyecho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              …it would completely destroy the world market

              I have to disagree with that, both the premise that they would and the result.

              It would simply take so much supply away that prices would go crazy.

              Is that what you mean by “destroy the market”? Because if prices “go crazy” the oil companies make bank and the reduced production doesn’t matter, to them anyway. In addition, this would push EV and renewables adoption pretty hard and since those are now extremely viable alternatives, cutting production to raise prices, as OPEC has done for decades, would not have the effect it used to.