LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1140arrow-down12
arrow-up1138arrow-down1imageBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareFisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoPlus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoImma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun. See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
minus-squareoptional@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoWhat about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoSomebody get DARPA on this, stat.
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 months agoWouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew Edited forgotten word to make it clearer
Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
Imma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun.
See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
What about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
Somebody get DARPA on this, stat.
Wouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew
Edited forgotten word to make it clearer