• Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          You can for past crimes, not future crimes.

          The whole statement: https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyworld

          About the manifesto

          If it’s confirmed, I don’t see why not. Depends on the community, of course. I’m sure !lemmybewholesome would remove it.

          https://lemmy.world/comment/13922763

          On the other hand, there is [email protected] that got created recently. This thread can interest you, it talks about jury nullification: https://lemmy.world/post/22973877

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          !lemmyworld

          We have previously asked moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification when this was suggested in context of murder or other violent crimes. Following a discussion in our team we want to clarify that we are no longer requesting moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification in the context of violent crimes when the crime in question already happened. We will still consider suggestions of jury nullification for crimes that have not (yet) happened as advocation for violence, which is violating our terms of service.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not true - we’re just not allowed to discuss jury nullification in the context of encouraging someone to commit a violent felony which includes the promise of absolution through jury nullification.

        Or something, idk. It was kinda weird.

        Jury nullification as two English words that can be spoken one after the other, however, is perfectly allowable.