Summary

President Biden recently authorized Ukraine to use longer-range U.S. missiles to strike inside Russia, marking a small but overdue escalation in the conflict.

This decision aims to disrupt Russia’s military operations and bolster Ukraine’s position, especially with the potential Trump administration favoring pro-Russian policies.

Russia’s retaliatory missile strike on Ukraine, though deadly, represents more of the same tactics.

Analysts argue Biden’s earlier caution was excessive, and calling Russia’s nuclear bluffs is strategically necessary to counter further extortion.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Biden isn’t escalating the war, he is slow-walking the aid. Too much to die, too little to live, as the Ukrainians say. If you give Russia 9 months to pull critical assests out of range and only allow strikes deep into Russia after a whole nother nations enters the war on the side of Russia, you can’t frame that as escalatory, no matter how much Putin bitches and moans.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Hmmm. My idea of the process is a little different. Embedded CIA reports to the DOD on daily to and fro of the war. What the Ukrainians needed yesterday isn’t necessarily what they will need tomorrow. Wars evolve. The DOD takes this information and projects future needs leading to a budget recommendation to Congress. Congress creates a budget bill and passes it. Johnson sitting on that bill, BTW, put Ukraine behind the 8 ball. Biden uses that allocation to buy weapons per the DOD recommendations. Rules placed on weapons use, such as not using US missiles on Russian ground, are meant to stop escalation into NATO entering into the conflict. In fact when that rule ochanged there was an escalation, but not involving NATO, yet.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well that’s a shit opinion not supported by foreign policy experts. And the US puppet government he’s running in Ukraine is largely made up of Nazis.

  • Lemmywings@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s way too late. Unless we are pro-war now it would’ve been better to make a peace plan before the other guy is in office.

        • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’m actually pretty doubtful that Russia still has much of a nuclear capacity. Maintaining a nuclear arsenal is very expensive, and the Russian oligarchs have been embezzling massive amounts of money from the military.

          They’ve had to resort to asking NK for help, so I don’t think they have a good chance of winning the current conflict, much less an actual NATO power.

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Triggering WWIII with other nuclear powers is the right thing to do?

    It gets easier by the day to manufacture consent

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You mean like the Zelenskyy regime, which is composed of Nazis, banned opposition parties & media, and refuses to hold elections? Is that not authoritarian?

        • NewDay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You do not hold elections during a war if your constitution says so. Many countries do it this way. Russia can hold as many elections as it wants because those are not real elections.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 hours ago

            So just never stop the war, and you can keep holding office with a constant influx of billions! Brilliant trick!

            • BigFig@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Are you actually just stupid? They are being LITERALLY invaded by Russia you stupid идиот

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      TIL triggering ww3 is when you don’t allow one nation to invade and conquer another.

  • NastyNative@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This decision is leading to another 90K NK troops and possible Yemen might send troops as well. The perpetual agitation of escalation cant be anymore clear. Yeah Russia deserves this but in no way is this not escalation.