• Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In Ontario, asshole political leader Doug Ford is trying to stop free public transit by paying for transit cops out of the provincial budget. That way no one can make the payment you just made. Can we have the same amount of money to spend on improving public transit? No. The only thing fearless leader Doug Ford fears more than free public transit is good public transit.

    What a bag of dicks. Watch other conservative states and provinces follow his lead!

    https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/doug-ford-announces-money-for-cops-asylum-seekers-in-ottawa-no-new-transit-funds-1.7098980

    • yonder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Wait, where in Ontario has free transit? The topic of your article, Ottawa, charges for transit.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It was floated last election and has made the rounds a few times. This is a pre emptive attack.

        • yonder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Darn. Free or even just cheaper transit would be pretty cool and might increase ridership. I mean, roads are free to use, so why not transit as well?

          • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yup that’s what the average person never factors in. Roads are 100% subsidized, so other forms of transit have to compete in the market against a free product. It’s really disturbing the process to get to an ideal efficient state.

            I’m not sure libertarian saying we should pay for roads, I’m just saying if we took all the money spent on transit and transportation (including cost of cars, gas, insurance, roads etc…) and pooled it, and allocated it to see what we could get for that money? I think we’d be living in a futuristic city with a free tram/train within a 5min walk of every house in the city. Most people probably would not buy a car unless they routinely traveled to rural locations.

            Alas, that kind of cost efficiency is only a dream at this point. Conservatives will keep on fighting to allow us to be nickel and dimed by corporations in the name of individual freedom.

            “we should be free to choose the manner in which we’re exploited by the rich”

            … Can we not be exploited by the rich?

            “No that’s socialism”