• cacheson 🏴🔁🍊@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is probably a bit too reductive. Violence is sometimes necessary, but isn’t always the best strategy.

    In general, the left should take an approach of nonviolent, disruptive agitation, combined with a willingness to use violence in self-defense. Arm up, protect each other, but don’t try to instigate a shooting war.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Moderates only ever succeed with and because of a radical flank demonstrating the alternative.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      No. The left should use violence as the tool it is that has always gotten results. Every right and freedom has come from the blood of those who fought.

      Leave the peaceful donothings to the lib/centrists, because they won’t do shit anyway.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If you’re going to use violence, be very smart about your targets who, where, how. You want those in power to fear, not the average gun toting American who is just trying to pay rent and buy food. If you make that population fear for their lives they won’t hesitate to kill you and in most of this country they could do so legally.