I’ve found that AI has done literally nothing to improve my life in any way and has really just caused endless frustrations. From the enshitification of journalism to ruining pretty much all tech support and customer service, what is the point of this shit?

I work on the Salesforce platform and now I have their dumbass account managers harassing my team to buy into their stupid AI customer service agents. Really, the only AI highlight that I have seen is the guy that made the tool to spam job applications to combat worthless AI job recruiters and HR tools.

  • 31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    I use LLMs for multiple things, and it’s useful for things that are easy to validate. E.g. when you’re trying to find or learn about something, but don’t know the right terminology or keywords to put into a search engine. I also use it for some coding tasks. It works OK for getting customized usage examples for libraries, languages, and frameworks you may not be familiar with (but will sometimes use old APIs or just hallucinate APIs that don’t exist). It works OK for things like “translation” tasks; such as converting a MySQL query to a PostGres query. I tried out GitHub CoPilot for a while, but found that it would sometimes introduce subtle bugs that I would initially overlook, so I don’t use it anymore. I’ve had to create some graphics, and am not at all an artist, but was able to use transmission1111, ControlNet, Stable Diffusion, and Gimp to get usable results (an artist would obviously be much better though). RemBG and works pretty well for isolating the subject of an image and removing the background too. Image upsampling, DLSS, DTS Neural X, plant identification apps, the blind-spot warnings in my car, image stabilization, and stuff like that are pretty useful too.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    to copy my own comment from another similar thread:

    I’m an idiot with no marketable skills. I put boxes on shelves for a living. I want to be an artist, a musician, a programmer, an author. I am so bad at all of these, and between having a full time job, a significant other, and several neglected hobbies, I don’t have time to learn to get better at something I suck at. So I cheat. If I want art done, I could commission a real artist, or for the cost of one image I could pay for dalle and have as many images as I want (sure, none of them will be quite what I want but they’ll all be at least good). I could hire a programmer, or I could have chatgpt whip up a script for me since I’m already paying for it anyway since I want access to dalle for my art stuff. Since I have chatgpt anyway, I might as well use it to help flesh out my lore for the book I’ll never write. I haven’t found a good solution for music.

    I have in my brain a vision for a thing that is so fucking cool (to me), and nobody else can see it. I need to get it out of my brain, and the only way to do that is to actualize it into reality. I don’t have the skills necessary to do it myself, and I don’t have the money to convince anyone else to help me do it. generative AI is the only way I’m going to be able to make this work. Sure, I wish that the creators of the content that were stolen from to train the ai’s were fairly compensated. I’d be ok with my chatgpt subscription cost going up a few dollars if that meant real living artists got paid, I’m poor but I’m not broke.

    These are the opinions of an idiot with no marketable skills.

  • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    To me it’s glorified autocomplete. I see LLM as a potencial way of drastically lowering barrier of entry to coding. But I’m at a skill level that coercing a chatbot into writing code is a hiderance. What I need is good documentation and good IDE statical analysis.

    I’m still waiting on a good, IDE integrated, local model that would be capable of more that autompleting a line of code. I want it to generate the boiler plate parts of code and get out of my way of solving problems.

    What I don’t want, is a fucking chatbot.

  • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use it all the time, to translate, explain, give guides, write code, do repetitive menial tasks, fix code, understand others code.

    I get the hatred for it, but I use it almost every day.

  • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I needed instructions on how to downgrade the firmware of my Unifi UDR because they pushed a botched update. I searched for a while and could only find vague references to SSH and upgrading.

    They had a “Unifi GPT” bot so I figured what the hell. I asked “how to downgrade udr firmware to stable”. It gave me effective step by step instructions on how to enable SSH, SSH in and what commands to run to do so. Worked like a charm.

    So yeah, I think the problem is we’re in the hype era of LLMs. They’re being over applied at lots of things they aren’t good at. But it’s extremism in the other direction to say there aren’t functions they can do well.

    They are at least better than your average canned chat/search bot or ill informed CSR at finding an answer to your question. I think they can help with lots of frustrating or opaque computer related tasks, or at least point you in the right direction or surface something you might not be able to find easily otherwise.

    They just aren’t going to write programs for you or do your office job for you like execs think they will.

  • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For me throwing a graph in and telling it to create a table from it and stuff like that is really super helpful, since I often have to do this, and by hand it’s a very tedious job. Sorting and cleaning tables and translating stuff is super handy and I use it quite often. But other then that I don’t care.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It’s funny to see Godzilla in weird contexts.

    No, I don’t think that’s a particularly good reason for it all, either.

  • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There are plenty of uses for it. There are also plenty of bad implementations that don’t use it in a way that helps anyone.

    We’re going through an overhyped period currently but we’ll see actual uses in a few years once the dust settles. About 10 years ago, a similar thing happened with AI vision and now everyone has filters they can use on cameras and face detection. We’ll reach another plateau until the next tech hype comes about.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I used it the other day to spit out a ~150 line python script. It worked flawlessly on the first try.

    I don’t know python.

    • Gumby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It might not work so flawlessly on the 2nd, 3rd, or 100th time though. I use ChatGPT semi-frequently for coding, while it generally does a surprisingly good job, I often find things it overlooks, and need to keep prompting it for further refinements, or just fix it myself.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There’s a handful of actual good use-cases. For example, Spotify has a new playlist generator that’s actually pretty good. You give it a bunch of terms and it creates a playlist of songs from those terms. It’s just crunching a bunch of data to analyze similarities with words. That’s what it’s made for.

    It’s not intelligence. It’s a data crunching tool to find correlations. Anyone treating it like intelligence will create nothing more than garbage.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Its funny to fuck around with, in the same way its funny ask a bible bot for Judges 15-16 and watching the bot get autobanned for saying ass.

    thats about all it is though, a stupid silly thing to fuck around with.

    Shouldnt be a production/human replacement thing.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s funny you mention this, but the erotic roleplay aspect of llms is a thriving business generating millions of dollars every month now in subscription costs.

      We’ve barely even scratching the surface of what these models can do and they’re increasing in usage at an exponential rate.

  • arrakark@10291998.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I ask it a lot of technical questions that are broad and non-specific. It helps to quickly get a gauge on what is the correct way to implement something.