Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 hours agotension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1114arrow-down1external-linktension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 hours agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarewinterayars@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·5 hours agoIt’s blatantly obvious and non-controversial what they’re doing. That’s why.
minus-squarebasmati@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 minutes agoExcluding developers because of arbitrary sections issued by the most war mongering country in at least the last 10,000 years is not non-controversial, as it turns out.
It’s blatantly obvious and non-controversial what they’re doing. That’s why.
Excluding developers because of arbitrary sections issued by the most war mongering country in at least the last 10,000 years is not non-controversial, as it turns out.