• echo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The evidence is that this group would vote for her if she changed policy on arms sales to Israel.

    The evidence is that if they don’t vote for her then they’re going to get Trump who will absolutely destroy Gaza (and the U.S.) If they don’t vote for her or don’t vote at all then they are fucking morons. They will take their moral convictions to their graves.

    • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The evidence is that if they don’t vote for her then they’re going to get Trump

      Yes. That’s right. And it’s entirely Harris’s fault. No one else’s. She could change policy and earn their vote. She doesn’t, and so hands the election to Trump.

      Yet you’re such a sycophant that instead of outrage at her, you’re outraged at the voters whom you think somehow owe her a vote. You’re outraged at the people practising democracy for not falling into line with the authoritarians trying to undermine it.

      Harris will win more votes than she will lose if she changes policy on arms sales to Israel. That is what the evidence shows - overwhelming support for such a policy among previously Democrat voters and abstainers in key states.

      Candidates changing policy to meet voter’s expectations is exactly how democracy functions, even flawed ones like the US normally vaguely track voter preferences.

      So if Harris changed policy she would not worsen her support, nor would she be doing anything other than her job.

      The fact that she isn’t will be the single fact responsible for a Trump win, if he wins. Nothing else. Every other person involved would have been acting accordingly, only the Harris team are out of line.

      They are acting undemocratically, and probably illegally, backing a genocide. And you’re defending them, and attacking the people supporting democracy and peace…

      • echo@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago
        The evidence is that if they don’t vote for her then they’re going to get Trump
        

        Yes. That’s right. And it’s entirely Harris’s fault. No one else’s. She could change policy and earn their vote. She doesn’t, and so hands the election to Trump.

        Oh fuck off with that… They’d rather vote for the fascist who has outright said he’d destroy Hamas? That’s on them for being stupid fucking morons. Don’t blame Harris for their stupidity.

        At the general election for POTUS is the wrong fucking time to plant your stake in the ground. Anyone who wants a different candidate in 2028 that supports their views needed to get really involved in 2020, at the latest. The next best time to do that is right now for 2028. I’m not defending Harris. I’m saying the people you’re talking about are fucking morons and need to suddenly get smart.

        • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          And let’s be clear here what you’re advocating.

          In the case that the Republicans are worse than the Democrats, people should vote Democrat and no other party.

          The Republicans will always be worse than the Democrats.

          Therefore, people should always vote Democrat in all cases and no other party.

          That’s exactly the Chinese totalitarian system. One party which you must vote for regardless of what you think of their policies.

          • echo@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’m saying that Harris or Trump will be the next POTUS and all you can do right now is express your preference on which one you want it to be.

            If you’re driving down the road and you come to a situation where you can either run over a person or hit a telephone pole then you have to decide what to do. You can gripe and moan about your situation and how you don’t want to either one, but that doesn’t change the reality. If you choose to not make a choice then the choice will be made for you and you’ll have to live with the consequences.

            • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 minutes ago

              you’ll have to live with the consequences.

              That’s true of all decisions. You’re advocating a single party autocracy. One whose opening policy is to support genocide. You’ll have to live with the consequences of that decision too.

              • echo@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I’m telling you the reality that Harris or Trump will be the next POTUS. Which one do you want it to be?

                • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  I’m not required to want either.

                  “Either some Ukrainian soldiers die, or Putin takes over Ukraine, that’s the reality”…

                  “Oh! So you want Ukrainian soldiers to die!”

                  Being prepared to risk something is not the same as actively promoting that thing. This is not up for debate, it’s a basic fact.

        • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Anyone who wants a different candidate in 2028 that supports their views needed to get really involved in 2020, at the latest.

          They did.

          Again, your blind faith that the system will work if only the people just tried harder is sycophantic at best, if not downright insulting.

          And besides, you’re the one imploring them to just vote without any regard to policy, so what exactly is “getting involved”?

          Why would the Democrats listen to anything anyone says if they’re guaranteed your vote come election day anyway?

          • echo@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            And besides, you’re the one imploring them to just vote without any regard to policy, so what exactly is “getting involved”?

            No, I’m saying that at this point in time that the next POTUS is either going to be Harris or Trump. Which of those two do you want it to be? Vote accordingly.

            • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              That’s the same thing.

              Your claim is that, come election time, we should always vote for the least worst party which has a chance of getting in. That’s always the Democrats and always will be if we follow your system.

              So the corollary of your system is that one party runs America for ever.

              So why bother with elections at all?

              • echo@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                You can deny reality all you want, but Harris or Trump is going to be the next POTUS. Which one do you want it to be?

                • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I want it to be whichever results from us attempting to preserve democracy.

                  Our nation has taken far, far bigger risks than 4 years of Trump to preserve democracy.

                  Determining something to be an acceptable risk is not the same as wanting it. Casualties are an acceptable risk of a just war. No one says people want soldiers to die.

                  I’m prepared to risk a Trump presidency to preserve some semblance of democracy and make it clear that genocide is never an acceptable option. That doesn’t mean I want a Trump presidency any more than being prepared to risk soldier’s lives during war means you want soldiers to die.

                  • echo@lemmings.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    I’m prepared to risk a Trump presidency

                    You’re not taking a risk. You are promoting a Trump presidency. If you can’t or won’t accept reality then there is no need to continue this conversation.