• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bruh, I’m talking about debate performance exclusively. She did perfect! I think there were a lot of subtle things she did that manipulated Trump into acting the way he did.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m proud of her!

      May I split a hair?

      I’d say… easier to defend “nearly perfect” - I’m sure if she created an edit where she gave new answers (think, magically, from a position of ignorance about what the opposition was about to say) it would be even better and could get to all but truly perfect.

      I caught about 2-3 wording fumbles early on. Hey I’ll take it, that’s not a knock, wouldn’t bring it up outside the context of discussing perfect performances.

      Wish we’d had her in the last debate :-/

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      She did perfect!

      So you think Kamala has zero room for improvement and it can only get worse from last night?

      Because that’s what perfect means, not a single bit that could have been handled better

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If I say you bowled a perfect game, that doesn’t mean every aspect of your life is perfect and everything will only ever get worse for you. It means in that one game you played, you could not do any better. Maybe in the future you can bowl perfect games as well, but you can never beat that game.

        Her debate performance was perfect. If she has a future debate, I believe it could only be worse.

        This says nothing about Kamala as a person or candidate or vice/president or even as a bowler.