Exactly. When WW2 is involved since the bad guys were the west, it’s “there’s two sides to every story”
But try explaining that if by their logic, Nazi Germany is wholesome chungus this whole time, does that mean the Soviet Union wasn’t all that bad? They’d go ballistic.
I need more psychology personality profiles on Stalin and Hitler to understand the events that surrounded the war. The weak defenses at D-Day make no sense given Hitler’s paranoid personality but Soviet Union’s victory makes sense given Stalin’s desire for a cult of praise.
History makes no sense without an indepth, fictional analyses of the early childhood of leaders.
This isn’t ancient Greece lmao, it was mostly recorded. What is he trying to achieve, re-writing history to favour the fascists?
yes. the west has been trying to do that in various ways since probably 1930
Exactly. When WW2 is involved since the bad guys were the west, it’s “there’s two sides to every story”
But try explaining that if by their logic, Nazi Germany is wholesome chungus this whole time, does that mean the Soviet Union wasn’t all that bad? They’d go ballistic.
I need more psychology personality profiles on Stalin and Hitler to understand the events that surrounded the war. The weak defenses at D-Day make no sense given Hitler’s paranoid personality but Soviet Union’s victory makes sense given Stalin’s desire for a cult of praise.
History makes no sense without an indepth, fictional analyses of the early childhood of leaders.