The kicker:
The system isn’t purely run on AI. It also relies on human input to help it learn and become more accurate.
And then
And so far it’s getting high marks from employees
(no employees interviewed or cited)
Who call it “Bo-Linda”
Love to regurgitate company PR material as fact
It makes me irrationally mad that machine learning has been renamed to “AI” through deliberate misuse
Well machine learning as always been a subfield of AI
Was it? Maybe in western parlance it was, but I think that’s completely inaccurate and is being pushed by companies to market their products
Like, why would you call decision trees or linear regression “Intelligent”? I feel like we’re just watering down what intelligence means at this point
That’s all liberal intelligence is
The bourgies want to devalue humans with this. Equal the humans to machines to bring more slavery.
I’m still disgusted by computer touchers using “meat” prefixes to denigrate human beings and make the computers they touch seem somehow more uplifted.
It’s crude reductionism in the form of “if you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail” thinking.
Well that’s what happens when you call statistics machine learning
The machine ain’t learning shit
I feel like we shouldn’t be surprised given the inaccurate mainstreaming of therapy jargon.