Like in terms of climate change, political climate, wars, etc. soviet-bashful

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t tell if you are serious. The country is so far up north and more than two thirds of the people live close to the US border.

      • Dingus_Khan [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        climate change could potentially turn frozen tundra into usable land.

        Not really unfortunately. It will be warm enough to live there more comfortably, but the land isn’t very usable compared to where people live now. Most of the tundra has very thin rocky soil and it is waterlogged and swampy. Just because it is warmer there doesn’t mean the actual ground becomes like the soil farther south

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Isn’t de-thawed permafrost really good for growing food tho? Besides the y’know possible disease and shit.

          • Magjee [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            We don’t know what’s trapped inside the permafrost, as it thaws we might unleash some sort of super bacteria or even worse, the Reagan/Thatcher blood amalgam trapped beneath trapped below

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              The horrors of our cyberpunk future, where the Reagan flu or Thatcher cough take you…

          • Dingus_Khan [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Idk, from a nutrients/chemical standpoint probably? The issue is that there’s like an inch of two of it over bedrock, instead of feet worth of good topsoil. There just isn’t enough of it to grow food on the scale we do now with current methods. Not to say any of that is technically impossible, just that it would be a massive megaproject the likes of which humanity has rarely seen

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s true… might happen that they pool all the permafrost earth into areas for farming. But indeed, a megaproject for the ages.

              Probably the grasslands in Russia would be easier to manage. Just get a bunch of megafauna to stamp and poop around for a decade or two.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not that simple. Sunlight is still an issue because that’ll still limit the growing season and the soil itself is extremely poor.

      • Edamamebean [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        No it couldn’t. The soil in the vast majority of Canada is shit/nonexistent. The good soil is in the southern parts of the country and already being farmed. The northern parts are all bedrock with a thin layer of pine needles sprinkled on top. Good luck growing anything on that.