Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • richieadler
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because one is ordered by their favorite imaginary character in their favorite fairy tale book.

    • waitmarks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Except its not even, at least for christians. Its actually even considered a sin for catholics. https://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-283.html

      It became popular in the US because it was thought that it would stop people from masturbating. That’s why its an American thing and not a religious vs non religious thing (except for jewish people).

      • Tathas@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah but Kellogg suggested circumcision as a punishment for when you were caught masturbating. Plus the recovery time would keep you from offending again in the short term.

    • archchan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Does such an order actually exist or do they pull it out of their ass in some convenient interpretation?

      • richieadler
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Probably the latter. Prepuces are actually a sign of the pact of the god with the Hebrews. Specifically.

      • Conyak@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is in the Bible in Genesis 16:11. I have to say that if my god told me to cut off part of my dick I would be looking for a new religion though.