Reddit is removing the debunking posts, so I’ll post it here.

  • SibshopsOPA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s not tactical, it’s just how guilt is generally determined. Speculative testimony (like “I think he did it for this reason”) is generally inadmissible in court. Speculation about motives isn’t evidence. Offering my own speculation about motives wouldn’t count as proof either, so it doesn’t make sense for me to do that.

    • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Speculation about motives isn’t evidence

      Absolutely correct. If I see anyone doing that, I’ll be sure to yell at them for you.