purpleworm [none/use name]

Carlson is a white nationalist, of course he’s an anti-semite.

I think you’re leaving out the international bourgeoisie from that estimation.

?

Some people claim it’s because of the Bread Book, but it always read to me as either “bread and roses” or some general idea that social welfare (typified by feeding the hungry) is good.

That person looks like Eren Yeager here.

It was a sign from God that golf is destructive

Pretend that their position is actually still more liberatory than their critic’s.

Especially by painting the critic as somehow a reactionary.

There are a lot of more conservative/fundamentalist protestants who will also tell you that you will go to Hell for suicide, but I’m sure there are places and denominations where that’s not true.

I assumed you already hated golf basically the maximal amount short of resorting to stochastic terror attacks because of how much of a greenspace guy you are. I apologize for underestimating the level of fury you are capable of while remaining coherent.

I’m glad the injury doesn’t seem to be too bad.

It’s frowned upon in Christian countries too, I’m not sure if that has a huge amount of bearing, though I strongly disbelieve the suicide guess.

Hey, at least its for something that it would actually be really good to accomplish.

Ah, my bad

Well, Luigi probably overstated the skill involved, but finding the window where he could do the hit still involved a bit of legwork (when that person would be going to a meeting where). In this case, since there aren’t CEOs of Islam (and the nearest equivalents aren’t in Scotland), the only other option for a similar effect is killing a politician, and they tend to have security. The would-be shooter also surely just personally hate Muslims and wanted the satisfaction of murdering them.

People say it has a minute of footage missing, I think

Is this real?

Well, remember how the entire political establishment was mobilized in explicit defense of cops for months? Yeah, it’s malleable, but it’s not just rocketing around for no reason.

Or if it’s in an environment where that leaves them absolutely crawling with bugs

At the time, as a country suffering under the boot of imperialism, New Democracy really did make sense. The point of it was strategic alliances to handle the most urgent problems first, like fighting off Japan with the KMT before fighting off the KMT. Mao was very emphatic that progress toward a more completely proletarian state must always be occurring and the New Democratic order could not be allowed to ossify. He believed so strongly in that fact that he essentially instigated a civil war against the state that he founded in order to fight the bureaucrats.

But Mao ultimately failed in his fight against bureaucracy and in the very end capitulated to the roaders.

I thought you were joking

Liberalism is itself not practical (liberal ideology taken to the rational extreme of practicality and efficiency is just fascism)

I think this is giving entirely too much credit to both liberalism and especially fascism. “Practicality” and “efficiency” both imply goals and evaluations of the worth of resources used to reach those goals. What are the goals? Who is doing the evaluating? These are questions that are, at best, hand-waved, but often entirely ignored.

Given the proper level of technological advancement, central planning is endlessly more practical and efficient than the anarchy of production under liberalism if your goal is broad societal welfare and not going through cyclical crises, and it is something that we should be pursuing.