Cool Project. Would love to have somthing sinilar for disability inclusivity :)

cheers! Thank you for the polite conversation on Lemmy. Which is unfortunately rare in politics/news communities :)

in this case I would have mentioned that in the post. Just so people are informed.

I don’t like this source:

Since the change of ownership in 2016, concerns have been raised about the paper’s editorial independence and self-censorship. Critics including The New York Times, Der Spiegel, and The Atlantic have alleged that the paper is on a mission to promote China’s soft power abroad.[9][10]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_China_Morning_Post

And disabled or chronically ill people!

wait how does a slightly downvoted post hit the front page.

That explains so much though, thanks, I felt so confused.

Imagine you see the world through a very specific political philosophy where nearly every adherant has read the book I’m referring too, and make a post in a community dedicated to that philosophy then 99% of the comments know nothing about it.

I was doubting if I’d gone crazy!

Would someone have the kindness to respond instead of downvoting :)

?

have you checked the community you’re in?

I’m talking about hunter gatherer society, not a pragmatic goal to defeat covid.

I’m praying we don’t fall asleep in the second half as is all too common with our team

Thanks. Appreciate it :)

I mean I’m not suprised my views are unpopular, I just thought they would be more popular in an anprim community.

Read against the grain by James C Scott. It was exceedingly rare. And the modalities of covid wouldn’t have allowed it, given the group dynamics of hunter gatherer society.

Please read my edit and the first thread of comments. My intention was to discuss pre-agricultural revolution.

Am I the only one who always reads Bardella instead of Barella. Man I’m scared for the french elections.

Due to how much smaller the community was yes. Also due to the fact there was limited contact with other communities, that we didn’t live in close proximity to animals in unhygienic conditions.

It’s a known fact that life expectancy declined with the agricultural revolution, and I think that’s a major reason why.

I kind of thought this was common knowledge in an anarcho primitivist community, but my bad for being wrong about that, since I am wrong about that, I acknowledge my post was poorly made.

Edit: Infectious events still occur in hunter gatherer communities, but due to the modalities of covid (loose infectiousness after a couple weeks and recieve a couple months of immunity) it wouldnt have survived beyond an initial infection of a small group.

My point about globalisation is not that it caused the pandemic, but that it caused it to spread quickly.

agreed. My point isn’t about medieval vs now though.

It’s that the pandemic never would have happened in pre-agricultural times. Obviously I wrote the post kinda quickly and acknowledge I didn’t phrase that properly.

extreme globalisation hightened the impact. If covid had started in medieval times, it might have taken decades to spread (as the black plague did).

yes completely agree. I edited my post to be more specific. Maybe anarcho-primistivism is not exactly what I thought it to be.

Agricultural revolution.

Living on permament land with majority reliance on grain and livestock. Increasing chance of catching and trasmitting illness compared to hunter gatherer counterparts.