Account abandoned and archived. Fun fact, the password was always “password”.
>looking for a new distro
>Ask the maintainer if their distro is woke communist or trans
>she doesn’t understand
>pull out illustrated diagram explaining what is communist and what is trans
>she laughs and says “it’s a good distro sir”
>install the image
>its trans
IPA zealots are getting bolder…
The theory of Permanent Revolution wasn’t that the USSR should have been invading and establishing socialist states in other countries. It’s more so that the Comintern (which was dominated by the USSR) should have maintained a more revolutionary line internationally. As we get into the Third Period of the Comintern and then the Popular Front we see the focus shift towards fascism and social democracy. Those debates resemble this one but I’ve already written too much.
What does this mean practically? The Soviet Union being more Rhetorically proselytizing in the League of Nations? Conducting itself with the moral character that will inspire foreign proletariat to rise up? Covertly sending (more) money and advisors to communist parties in capitalist countries? building revolutionary parties to lead uprisings sooner, like the Yugoslav Communists tried and failed at during the Interwar period? The philosophy seems coherent, but I’m struggling to think of what actions they thought were being unfairly deferred, which at all seemed remotely viable with the retrospective they had even then.
Sapkowski is a troll who lies in interviews, and has never given a straight answer about where his politics lie. In the Hussite Trillogy, the main character literally says in the 2nd book that he’s joining the hussites to establish “Communism” by name which is pretty impressive considering it’s 1426.
yo, how was the JFK assassination an engineering epic fail?
Map of countries that support Argentina’s claims in the South Atlantic