Name one person prostituting for $5 that is in a stable living situation.

Haha vandalizing someones property when they’re in an unstable living situation, lol this is so funny.

I am not a lawyer and do not know legal law, but I do know that a verbal contracts are legally binding and do not impede upon free speech. This would be a case similar to that. They want to say they will do everything to get something done, I want to see them immediately removed from office for doing shit that counters it.

My point does not in any way interact with FPTP and is not an instead of. All I’m saying is we should legally define what promises you can make on the campaign and hold people accountable for lying to constitutents.

Rivals of Aether 2 announced there will be no paid DLC because it will be all free. Legislation is needed but there are still, few, good devs out there thankfully.

Rich and oppression

No, laws should be in place that make this illegal. I want every speech a candidate gives to be under oath and punishable by being banned from holding office.

“It’s crazy, all we had to do was inverse the YT algorithm,” said anonymous Google employee.

Because you’re on Lemmy and no one here seems to be, you included.

That’s if you buy one new, which is only gentrified relabelling of RVs. I just converted a bus myself for 25k, which is what most people who actually live in them full time do. Anyone buying one is likely using it as a “second home” aka RV.

“On purpose” here means “Buying a house isn’t an option anymore”

“I have more respect for loyal DOGS than I do for PEOPLE who don’t take care of their children," in the vacuum they’re describing, could be interpreted as having a lot of respect for dogs and little respect for abusive parents, which are not asshole takes.

Also not in the religion, they’re specifically instructed that they’re not to make judgements or enact any punishments on the behalf of god, which this is.

Wouldn’t 99% of people who are opposed to murder will never be a murderer the more reflective statement here?

Also pro-choice.

Buddy this is critical theory.

Okay, you have one point of data, the USSR, can you list a second point of data, otherwise this is not a trend of socialism but of a single country.

Please list all the recommended political theory you’ve read from the 1920s to now that disproves whatever you’re claiming is purely 1920s political theory.

This is tankie? It seems just communist.

Survivorship bias!

Many corporations force you to sign away your work when working for them, so what you describe is already happening.

If you’re a company why would you even fuck with more difficult trade.