What’s the fuzz about Antonielli anyways? He’s currently 6th in the F2 and has yet finish on the podium. That’s respectable, but doesn’t look like the next Verstappen. From the current grid, Leclerc, Russel, Hamilton, Norris, Piastri, Hülkenberg and possibly some others all had far more impressive rookie seasons in F2/GP2

In Pathfinder even on weaker creatures it’s important to call out the number because it may or may not crit

Yes that’s exactly right, because the alternative manages to somehow be even worse. All hail the two party system.

Surely it’s a strange decision to negotiate no gardening leave with RB if he was just going to retire anyway?

Maybe it was a just in case measure. So that he can say yes if the right opportunity arrives. Either way he is in a weird spot when it comes to designing a 2026 car. By the time he leaves Red Bull in 2025, the teams will have already laid down the fundamental design of their 2026 car, so he wouldn’t be able to design it from the ground up. And in the era of the cost cap, the cars of the following years will likely be evolutions of the 2026 car rather than Newey’s own design. We saw how long it took Mercedes to get away from their zero sidepod design and it’s probably still hurting them.

Geht mir genauso, wobei einige der Communities die ich vermisse noch nicht mal so nieschig sind. Auf reddit gibt’s da Millionen Mitglieder und regelmäßig Beiträge mit über 100 Kommentaren, während es hier vielleicht 200 Mitglieder gibt, Beiträge seltener sind und die oft auch noch unkommentiert bleiben.

Wäre dann der Meilenstein bei ~320 000 Kommentaren?

Another one for the naughty list
https://xkcd.com/838/

And one final interesting fact, our sun is actually moving at 200km/s, as is earth, and everything else in our solar system, as it moves around the milky way.

To be fair, nothing is ever stationary except in very specific frames of reference. I think it’s usually fair to say that the sun is stationary because most of the time when we discuss observations involving the sun, those observation happen within our solar system so the sun is the frame of reference. Otherwise you’d have to constantly point out that a house, tree, mountain or whatever is not stationary, because it moves with the earth.

Many governments on the planet have less money than some big tech or oil companies. Obviously not those of large industrious nations, but most nations aren’t large and industrious.

There is nothing objectively wrong with your statement. However, we somehow always default to solving that issue by having some dragon hoard enough gold, and there is something objectively wrong with that.