33 arty, wow. Still hitting logistics hard too, by the look.

Just need to get AI on that.

deleted by creator

damn

Among other issues that’s going to make it harder for them to do other stuff.

goes down with distance by an exponential factor
(1/x^3)

Umm… those two things are not equivalent. b^(-x) would be exponential, x^(-k) is inverse-power for whatever k

Its showing for me

It has been a pretty short trip from “Don’t be evil” to “The cutting edge of late stage capitalism”

took me a minute. Still waking up. The Bilbo Frodo age diff is 111-33, though so if this is Frodo at 50, Bilbo is older than 111 at the time of writing

face, meet leopard

git branch testing.stephanie.slept.with.my.friend.brad

Then delete and start over, or don’t use data you don’t have explicit permission to use. in the first place.

It’s like a thief saying “well, I already fenced most of the stuff so it’s too hard to give any of it back. So let’s just call it quits, eh?”

or bloody universal healthcare

I guess it depends on where you live. It’s not true of the whole world.

Waiting for 100% oral exams to make a comeback.

The headline’s confusing. If a losing bet is backfiring, does that mean it’s now a winning bet?

heh, all of them (plus several others) were on my list of “never buy from them” list a decade ago. Never had any reason to reconsider

Well, that’s something I hadn’t seen before.

It’s not the word “lighter” that’s the issue, it’s the word “less”. If I say something weighs 80% less, … you know how much that is. 100% less, it weighs even less – nothing at all. 500% less (i.e. 5 times less), suddenly it weighs more?

Neither, though I do watch a bit of Matt Parker on youtube, so it’s a decent guess.

It’s a publicly traded company. It’s owned by shareholders. You may be thinking of the CEO.

“one fifth the mass” is not the same thing as “five times lighter”

Consider something that weighs half as much. It’s 50% lighter … 0.5 times lighter. Something that weighs 0.2 times as much has 20% of the weight, and is 80% lighter. If it weighed 1% as much, it would be 99% lighter (0.99 times lighter). If it was 100% lighter … it would weigh nothing. Five times lighter would be -4 times the original mass.

We already have accurate and precise ways to describe less mass (albeit leaving aside for the moment the distinction between mass and weight). It’s no harder to say “one fifth” than “five times”, but only one is correctly describing what is going on.